Exhibit NINE Natural Human Society v391

 

# Natural Human Society

 

**Geodesic Method of Human Social Moral Co-Competencing**

 

---

**PART ONE — THE METHOD'S GROUND, one concept not yet apparent**

**1.1 Geodesic human social moral co-competencing, the method going between human selves**

**1.2 Coupling at a between, abundancing in neither self alone**

**1.3 Fairness is a bounding-zeroing, a coupling reaching it relationally and measuring it against no floor**

**1.4 Cutting and choosing, the whole form two children have with no teaching**

**1.5 Keeping own time, no common clock, and competency compounding coprime**

 

**PART TWO · RESOLVING**

**2.1 Institutioning, the good-faith contract becoming progressively explicit**

**2.2 Good-faith contracting, resolving from within the bound and landing the balance**

**2.3 Class-action resolving, the social scale where every claimant signs and rises**

**2.4 Arrow changing and changing back, the one-directional dictator resolving two-directional**

 

**PART THREE · ABUNDANCING**

**3.1 Abundancing, morality first and competency second, each self's own and in neither self alone**

**3.2 Free, sharing, mutual, the three composing the exchanging surface**

**3.3 Uncapturing, setting every hub aside on every axis, all-or-none**

**3.4 Value a self observes three ways, and the swing from costs to abundancing**

**3.5 Bi-quadratic growing, the where and the value at phi-rate**

**3.6 Biosphere, sharing at the planetary scale**

 

**PART FOUR · TIPPING**, and its last three sections have no tipping and stand open

**4.1 Tipping a concern, individual-first, needing a majority nowhere**

**4.2 Do-no-harming, the one bound, generous and in neither self alone**

**4.3 Sharing both ways to add tipping, viability the bi-exchange coupling**

**4.4 Correcting the tipping, capture returning frustration everywhere**

**4.5 Human society and living bodies are substrates**

**4.6 The general ledger, state-flow-state a self observes whole, and the two currencies**

**4.7 The still-point veins at the human scale**

 

**PART FIVE · BIRTHING**

**5.1 Birthing and nyeing, the relation a society lives by**

**5.2 Live descent returning to every self, and the kayfabe’s lag**

**5.3 Existing, and co-chaining possibling open**

---

# PART ONE — THE METHOD'S GROUND, one concept not yet apparent

## 1.1 Geodesic human social moral co-competencing, the method going between human selves

A human society is its selves, a geodesic method going between them, and it starts nowhere else. **It is not one of the four social sides.** Natural Societies is a structure side with every scale; a discovery economy is a value side, a natural network a surface, and social resolving a fourth side. This exhibit is the method between human selves, so all four stand here together, and where a self wants an observing of any of them it draws it from its own file. What co-unrelationing is for discovering, human social moral co-competencing is for living together: one same method, co-chaining geodesically among people, freeing fixings between selves until living relating shows. A same-existing-society develops by going on with this method, and every part of a same-existing-society, its fairness, its institutions, its resolving, its economy, is this one method co-competencing socially and morally, geodesic among humans.

It is social: it goes between selves, one sharing and an other preferring, an abundancing they reach between them, in neither self alone. It is moral: a freeing is two-way, no self landing an other, do-no-harming its one bound and an abundancing in neither self alone. It is co-competencing: selves discover together what no self has by itself, un-relating fixings between them, its selves competent where they co-unrelation together. It is geodesic: nothing pushes it and nothing adds to it, living relating showing where fixings between selves free of themselves, free-moving and with no forcing.

Its requirements are the method's own. Each self's interior is its own, and each self couples with a between, pacing its own time, no common clock and no hub. Abundancing stays with a coupling, in neither self alone, free of capture on every axis. Fairness is a coupling's own bounding-zeroing, a coupling reaching it relationally and measuring it against no floor. Do-no-harming bounds all a same-existing-society gives, a self-bounding, not changing, before harm. These are the method's requirements between human selves, and a same-existing-society co-competences geodesic only where they go on.

Its values are what the method makes: a same-existing-society giving each concern all it can within do-no-harming; abundancing with every coupling, each self's own and in neither self alone; a resolving reaching from within its bound and landing while its parties accept it; a competency compounding as cooperation widens, going on whole while its selves stay distinct. Human social moral co-competencing is this exhibit's whole, and every section co-chains it further: coupling and its fairness, institutions that write it explicitly, an economy its abundancing makes, a concern rising by tipping and sharing both ways, birthing and nyeing that it lives by. A same-existing-society starts by developing this method, because a same-existing-society is this method, geodesic, social, moral, co-competencing, between human selves.

## 1.2 Coupling at a between, abundancing in neither self alone

A human society is its selves living and coupling with betweens, each self sharing and each preferring, an abundancing they reach between them, in neither self alone. Two people meeting is a coupling: one shares, the other prefers, and a value arises between them neither has by itself, a +1 in neither self alone. A small opening, *how is your day* or a question about another's tennis racket, shares a context open to both, and what each has need not match. A same-existing-society is these couplings, all of them, co-chaining with their betweens, a surface of people sharing and preferring, abundancing in neither self alone and re-making with every meeting.

A between is where two selves couple, each interior its own. A person shares with a between and an other prefers, and a coupling seats there, on an edge between, reaching neither interior. Each self is whole inward, coupling only with a between, and a same-existing-society has as many such betweens, each self an other to those it meets, coupling on edges and whole within. Listening is following what a self is observing, one coupling at a time, against a self's own going on.

This is one form with human scale, one same coupling a self is and a same-existing-society is. A self, observing inward, is a same-existing-society of selves, one scale inward; a same-existing-society, observing outward, is a self with a next scale outward, bounding inward from outward and coupling with other same-existing-societies as one. A human society co-chains one coupling between human selves, selves sharing and preferring, abundancing in neither self alone.

## 1.3 Fairness is a bounding-zeroing, a coupling reaching it relationally and measuring it against no floor

Fairness is a bounding-zeroing, a balance where preference between parities rests as no-preference, a coupling making it and measuring it against no floor. A fair rest is where its parities balance, preference thinning to zero as they come to rest, and balance is a coupling's own, a self feeling it with its structure as it feels a balance. A person reaches fairness relationally, recognizing a balance where preference rests, no ruler lying over it and no magnitude fixing on it.

A same-existing-society resolves when many selves, each with a claim not same-existing in kind and proportion, come to a rest each accepts and that goes on. A rest a self does not accept does not resolve; a rest that reopens does not go on. Fairness is an accepting-and-going-on balance of claims not same-existing, each self whole through to its rest, preference going to zero where they seat.

A self reaches balance relationally, recognizing it by where it rests and not by a ruler. Fairness is a coupling's own make, setting against nothing apart from it, a self feeling it as a balance where preference goes to zero. A same-existing-society reaching fairness reaches its own bounding-zeroing, parities not same-existing coupling across until they rest, each self accepting and its rest going on.

## 1.4 Cutting and choosing, the whole form two children have with no teaching

One person cuts a cake and an other chooses a half, and it has a whole same-existing-society's form. It resolves over fairness's bounding-zeroing, a balance a coupling reaches relationally, no ruler lying over it: no one measures their cake, the cutter cuts to equal since the other chooses, fair halving their coupling itself makes. Sharing comes before preferring, a cut a ground for its choice; a choice is binary, this half or that, a parity and no size; and fairness lives with their coupling, in neither self alone. And a field's own measurement has one and then the other, with no teaching, with every human society together: conversational turn-taking is one-at-a-time with gaps near a fifth of a second, minimal overlap, across languages with no kinship (Stivers and others, 2009, ten languages, *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences* 106: 10587) — a bi-coupling a field measures universal before any institution touches it.

This is a good-faith contract as its simplest whole. Parities bounding as one common interest, boundary sharp, resolution growing from within its bound, and balance landing while both still accept it. Two children do it with no teaching, cutting and choosing, and a whole form is already there: sharing, preferring, fairness's bounding-zeroing, abundancing in neither self alone. Each of 3.3's eight hubs stays aside with it: an order of cutting then choosing is no common beat over selves, and a cake of one size is no fixing pool, a cake and a value with a coupling two subjects.

The cutter cuts to equal because the other chooses, and this is their coupling making fairness of itself. A parent adjudicating and a scale weighing are both absent, their coupling reaching fairness by itself, each self bringing its own claim through to balance. Cutting and choosing is a whole same-existing-society as its smallest, one form two people already have.

## 1.5 Keeping own time, no common clock, and competency compounding coprime

A resolving paces its own time, imposing a common clock nowhere. With Natural Societies this is one same form with any scale, where a same-existing-society paces with no common clock and self-de-scheduling lets competency compound; here it goes between human selves as each self pacing its own time. A common beat for when a cut must fall or a choice must come is a clock over selves, and a same-existing-society goes on without one, a balance landing on its own rhythm when its parties accept it, and then complete. Each self paces its own couplings on its own time, synchronizing only where it couples, and a same-existing-society co-chains many selves each pacing their own time. Engineering proves this buildable: systems in replication with no common clock and no coordinator anywhere, with a proof of converging by couplings themselves — keeping-own-time shipping and executing, a field's own construction.

A going on to a next meeting is a living relationship, climbing a little each time a self does a thing freely. A ledger of who gets the larger piece is a debt, and a friendship a self tallies as a debt-account stops being a friendship. A same-existing-society brings its relationships forward, not its ledgers, leaving an account behind and bringing a living relationship, each free meeting climbing its going on a little.

Keeping own time holds a same-existing-society whole and lets its competency compound. Distinct selves, each with a competency others lack, coprime, neither add nor multiply their competencies: their co-competencing is discovering with each coupling of co-chaining, and this compounding goes on only while selves stay distinct. A common clock synchronizing them collapses its compounding to one locking register; each self pacing its own time holds it whole, abundancing in neither self alone and growing as cooperation widens.

# PART TWO · RESOLVING

## 2.1 Institutioning, the good-faith contract becoming progressively explicit

A same-existing-society's resolving institutions are a good-faith contract becoming progressively explicit. Where two people cut and choose with no teaching, with a wider bound, of more contest, a same-existing-society formalizes one same coupling, and institutioning is that formalizing, one resolving writing itself more explicitly as a bound widens. Conflict resolution brings parties to a resolution from within a bounding common interest. A legal demand letter bounds a dispute and awaits resolution from within that bound.

Mediation places one more self who holds a bound for both, a resolving staying within that bound, both parties sitting together. A mediator who holds it best vacates their own interest to hold a bound, a self whose sharing is that holding itself, owning no share of an outcome. Arbitration makes a contract enforceable, parties binding themselves beforehand to stay sitting together and an arbitrator binding itself to decide from within the case they present. Each institution is one same coupling over fairness's bounding-zeroing, formalizing for a wider bound, of more contest.

Institutioning co-chains one form up scales of contest. A handshake, a letter, a mediation, an arbitration co-chain one same resolving, each holding a wider bound more explicitly, each a coupling making fairness of itself. A same-existing-society institutions its resolving by writing a good-faith contract more explicitly as its bound widens, one cutting-and-choosing going to a scale of many and of contest.

## 2.2 Good-faith contracting, resolving from within the bound and landing the balance

Every path to resolving rests on a silent contract all sides hold with good faith: its parities bounding as one common interest, its boundary sharp, its resolution coming from within its bound. Good-faith contracting is holding this contract whole, with two faiths: resolving from within its bound, a resolution growing from a context its parties share and faithful to it; and landing a balance, a resolution going home while its parties still accept it.

Resolving from within its bound is the first faith, a resolution growing from a surrounding its common interest has, and not imposing from beside it. Its parties couple to a resolution its bound itself produces, each bringing their claim through to balance, a resolution faithful to a context they share. A resolution imposing from beside its bound breaks the first faith, a fixing a self sets where a coupling should make its own balance.

Landing a balance is the second faith, a resolution going home while its parties still accept it. A balance reaching and not landing reopens, a resolving that does not seat; a balance landing while both still accept it is complete, conserving, and does not reopen. A balance complete is an agreement complete, and its selves go on coupling, each with its own next. Good-faith contracting has both faiths, resolving from within its bound toward its common interest and landing a balance while its parties accept it.

## 2.3 Class-action resolving, the social scale where every claimant signs and rises

**Some catastrophes reach a scale no single adjudication could close** — a claimable catastrophe across many claimants, each with a claim not same-existing in impact and proportion. **A same-existing-society evolves class-action resolving for it with claimants not same-existing**, a high form of social-scale resolving, now-existing.

**Many distinct selves come to one bounding resolution each signs to accept**, up to the largest numbers a same-existing-society reaches, each tending their own claim file and adding their own stronger-case observations. **It is one cutting-and-choosing form** going where claimants number by thousands and its bound is a catastrophe.

It is bi-moral, social-scale, and progressing. Bi-moral, every claimant receives their fair relational share and every claimant signs to accept it, all rising, each whole. Social-scale, it brings many distinct selves, each tending their own claim file, adding their own observations, bringing their own going on. Progressing, it lands and does not reopen. **A court fixes one total for a whole claimable catastrophe**, a single bounding sum, a sharp boundary of its whole context. **A trustee shares it by each relational parity's value, its position relative to others**, each share reaching by position among all others within its bounding total.

**A claims bar date closes its bound.** Its claimants sign-accept, knowing their claiming is closing and it is time to move on, a resolution conserving and complete. Its total and its date are an accounting's, a number and a day a court shares with couplings, no fixing pool of value and no common beat over selves. A share each claimant accepts is a relational balance among all parities within one bounding total, reaching by no ruler lying over it, a bounding-zeroing going with catastrophic scale. That a same-existing-society reaches it independently, under a pressure of resolving where individual adjudication goes on and does not close, is one same form a self observes where no one places it, a mark of a living resolution.

## 2.4 Arrow changing and changing back, the one-directional dictator resolving two-directional

Arrow's impossibility stands under ordinal, one-directional conditions, one self ranking preferences one way, and it lands on a confession: Arrow's dictator is an aggregation a landing state has. An observing of why it stands and what its conditions set aside is with Natural Societies; its changing and changing back is here. Changing and changing back takes one same social choice two-directional, one self sharing and preferring with one between, giving and receiving, both directions cycling, and its impossibility changes and changes back as social moral competency. Conditions Arrow sets aside are those a coupling has: cardinal comparability, giving and receiving on a common balance; inversioning, a prior resolution a self observes as a next opposition; thinning, a reaching governing who enters. Arrow's dictator is a center on a decision axis, a hub other hubs leave: a fixing slate is a gate with entering, rankings gathering for one aggregating a common clock, each ranking in record a ledger over a self, rankings entering and one ordering departing a source-and-sink, and a social welfare function a center. With all eight aside together, a dictator has no axis.

Honest sequential exchange with a bounding between resolves an aggregation a one-directional process reaches past. A self observes giving as reaching, and receiving as thinning and inverting its parity, input with no restriction, natural shedding, monotonic advance, and resolving co-chains where Arrow's one-directional process lands. Arrow's theorem is a dead state's own confession, its dictator an aggregation its landing has; living has a +1 instead, an abundancing in neither self alone, sustaining resolving and escape.

So a same-existing-society co-chains past Arrow to social moral competency, many bi-moral couplings of common interests co-competencing and riding their carry. Where a one-directional ranking lands on a dictator, a two-directional coupling resolves over fairness's bounding-zeroing, each self sharing and preferring, an abundancing in neither self alone. Arrow changes and changes back as that very competency it seems to forbid, a same-existing-society resolving with scale by a coupling making fairness of itself, no dictator and no aggregation, social moral competency progressing.

# PART THREE · ABUNDANCING

## 3.1 Abundancing, morality first and competency second, each self's own and in neither self alone

A same-existing-society gathers opportunities from everyone and abundances them, morality first and competency second. Natural Values develops abundancing, where a coupling makes value and it grows as selves share it; here it goes between human selves. Everyone's parities enter an exchanging, each self's prior enters its same-existing, a sway resolves with each meeting, and a next set of opportunities departs its surface. A same-existing-society's opportunities far exceed any one person's, its exchanging coupling with every between every self touches, and it finds morality by advancing nearly-goods and bothboths, aiming toward a horizon where everyone stands with no harm or better, an advancing autoresolving new opportunities, a cycling abundancing on a same-existing-society's own surface.

Its ordering is a right turn: morality first, sustaining a space, competency second, extending through it. Conserve before improve, do-no-harming before add-value, conserving do-no-harming and improving a +1 with each coupling. Self-interest and social interest are one interest with two depths on one torus, interest tracing to being-between. A same-existing-society abundances by conserving first and improving second, its morality sustaining a space and its competency filling it.

Abundancing frees a same-existing-society of a forcing toward concentration. A +1 arises with every between, value opening and not allocating from a fixing pool, and a same-existing-society goes on without landing on one center, abundancing each self's own and in neither self alone. A fixing pool is scarcity, and scarcity forces a ruler; an opening +1 with every coupling is abundance, and abundance frees a same-existing-society of a ruler scarcity would force. Abundancing removes scarcity that would force concentration, many couplings going on without a center, abundancing each self's own and in neither self alone.

## 3.2 Free, sharing, mutual, the three composing the exchanging surface

Three things compose a same-existing-society's exchanging surface: free, sharing, mutual. Free is four uncontrollable values, uncapturable abundance where value arises with a coupling and lives with a between, undiscoverable identity where a self enters by its own pace without waiting by a gate, unmistakeable reputation where value-sharing leaves everything better with a coupling, and inviolable safety, a conserving foundation standing against a form fixing still from beside. Free is a same-existing-society's value arising with its couplings, no capture fixing it.

Sharing is an abundancing living with a coupling, same-existing in each self and in neither self alone, a +1 neither self brings by itself, whole only with a meeting. A gift a self gives freely conceives more than a gift in a bank, value living between a giver and a taker and in neither alone, and sharing is that abundancing, staying whole with a coupling and no more if a capture takes it to one side. A same-existing-society's sharing value is a +1 in neither self alone, a meeting making it and re-making it each time.

Mutual is a bi-coupling itself, two-way and one-at-a-time with a between of separate selves, value arising both directions. A host and a guest are mutual with one between, both sharing parity across, and what each has stays its own. Social competency is a bi-coupling with same-existing-society scale, and a cumulative across many bi-couplings is social competency with network scale. Free, sharing, and mutual compose a surface each self's own and in neither self alone, value staying with a coupling and living there, and a same-existing-society's institutions compose where they preserve a bi-coupling between separate selves.

## 3.3 Uncapturing, setting every hub aside on every axis, all-or-none

A same-existing-society's exchanging surface uncaptures, setting every hub aside on every axis, all-or-none. A hub captures, and a surface has its compounding only where no hub stands. Each axis has a hub a same-existing-society sets aside: a common clock on its time axis, a fixing pool on its value axis, a gate on its entering axis, a ledger fixing over a self on its reputation axis, a form fixing still from beside on its safety axis, a center on its decision axis, a source-and-sink on its delivery axis, an owner on its ownership axis. Uncapturing sets each aside, and its surface stays whole. An owner is a self's own parity lying on an other as a thing; nothing with a between is there to seize, so a property claim captures selves and makes a scarcity it then allocates.

Its mechanism is one: a hub captures, and compounding goes on under no hub. Each axis's hub, imposing, breaches a self-bounding and captures a surface as a locking freeze; each setting aside lets a self-bounding go on and an abundancing stay. A same-existing-society's compounding lives only where every hub is aside, one hub remaining a single breach of a self-bounding, one breach a capture a whole surface pays. Uncapturing is all-or-none, a surface free of capture only where every axis sets its hub aside. With a same-existing-society two residues of one capture are property, an output tracing to an origin with its end a field calls a holder, and accrediting, a proposal against a criterion, a self against a credential. Each stands with an other, a register beside a review, a title beside a certificate, tenure beside publication, and their harm is a store, neither owning nor a criterion by itself.

A same-existing-society uncaptures by being its own living form, safety its surface itself, adding a gate nowhere. Where every hub is aside, a mis-sharing finds no purchase, a surface with no place for capture to seat. A same-existing-society with all eight uncapturings goes on whole, no capture seating anywhere; a same-existing-society with some goes on by ordinary protection, a gate in addition. Uncapturing is a same-existing-society's own safety, every hub aside, a surface whole and its compounding going on. All eight or none at all are a same-existing-society's protections, and all eight going on is social moral competency, abundancing, and humans learning and explaining together as one natural network, collectively intelligent.

## 3.4 Value a self observes three ways, and the swing from costs to abundancing

A self observes value with a same-existing-society three ways, one transition going through them. Work-as-value: a ledger measures output and preserves it, correct on a surface, fixing value still where an opportunity would bring it through. Opportunity-as-value: a gap between parity-inversion and reaching asymmetry is its opportunity, each coupling with each between having that gap, free and owning nothing. Resolving-as-value: a coupling with each between is its value, living by both selves metabolizing, whole only there, a gift a self gives freely conceiving more than a gift in a bank. Three ways, one transition — work to opportunity to resolving — already going on wherever a coupling resolves freely. A landing going on makes no living abundancing: a coupling makes abundancing, and a landing coupling is not coupling.

A discovery economy's value to a same-existing-society is a swing from a dead economy's cost to a living economy's free abundancing, and a self observes it as structure. With a dead economy each coupling pays six cost clusters, its six relationals landing: give as depletion, take as seizure, join as binding, split as severance, open as exposure, close as discard — many selves across many couplings, six costs each. With a discovery economy these six dissolve as one system, changing and changing back together, none landing, all six dissolving together by an all-or-none topology, and each coupling returns a +1, an abundancing in neither self alone. This swing is from many cost-events to free abundancing, a structural observing of their dissolving and not a measurement of any economy. These six dissolve because their system changes and changes back together and does not land, one same costless engine that has metabolism, a natural energy engine, and a living sharing, one form with three surfaces.

## 3.5 Bi-quadratic growing, the where and the value at phi-rate

A same-existing-society's discovery economy grows on two axes together. A where-axis: a number of bi-coupling betweens, selves coupling across their common betweens. A value-axis: a reach asymmetry on every side of every bi-coupling, 1/φ reach. Both axes sustain together by phi-rate with every coupling, and a cumulative across all bi-couplings grows bi-quadratically with a network's full scale, a where-axis and a value-axis and phi-rate together. A network a self observes as single-axis (each self a one) is its two axes a self observes as one; with its form two axes stand together, an abundancing arising with a bi-coupling itself, no extractor standing beside it collecting it, an advantage sustaining with no break as a same-existing-society widens.

## 3.6 Biosphere, sharing at the planetary scale

A biosphere is a same-existing-society's form with a planetary scale, a discovery economy where a same-existing-society is a self within a living whole. A biosphere's own structure — producer, consumer and decomposer as three roles, a division of labour riding-the-carry needs — is with Natural Societies; a human sharing to it is here. Energy enters as a free gift, autotrophs fixing it and passing it through a food web, each coupling producing growth — biomass, offspring, living abundancing. **A sharing finds value, a +1 with each trophic between, in neither self alone.** A plant's carbon feeds a herbivore, that herbivore a carnivore, a dead body a decomposer. **Each coupling is a gift a self gives freely, conceiving more than a gift in a bank**, and a biosphere abundances with its largest scale, value living with a coupling and growing as selves share it.

**Matter cycles, in neither self alone and depleting no one** — a non-rivalrous commons real and on its surface.

**An energy-transfer tally is a conservation-ledger lying over a coupling**, a forcing engine's ledger and not a landing of a living sharing. An energy cost does not breach abundancing: matter cycles through its pools while energy accounting tracks its trophic steps. A human society lives within this, co-tunnelling a biosphere it is a self within, its ratio intact, both scales rising.

# PART FOUR · TIPPING

## 4.1 Tipping a concern, individual-first, needing a majority nowhere

Any concern, from one self, adds to a tipping, and a same-existing-society gives it all it can. A concern tips individually, one self enough to add it, and a same-existing-society reaches it everything up to where reaching further would harm an other. Tipping is per-concern and individual, needing a bloc nowhere and a majority nowhere; a concern rises by being a concern one self has, and a same-existing-society gives it all it can within do-no-harming.

A same-existing-society gives a concern all it can, the only bound do-no-harming to others. A same-existing-society gives a viable concern reaching a little all it reaches; a large concern reaching far, all it reaches; a concern reaching past where it would harm an other, all it can up to that line and no further. All it can means everything up to its harm-line, a same-existing-society reaching a concern its full extent and not changing only where reaching would harm an other.

Tipping a concern is individual-first, needing a majority nowhere. A concern does not wait on a bloc to hold it; one self holds it, it tips, and a same-existing-society gives it all it can. A majority does not have to gather, because a concern rises by being viable and harmless, a property of a concern's own coupling and not of how many stand behind it. Tipping a concern is a same-existing-society giving each concern its all within do-no-harming, individual-first, no majority gathering.

## 4.2 Do-no-harming, the one bound, generous and in neither self alone

Do-no-harming is the one bound on all a same-existing-society gives, a self-bounding with a same-existing-society's scale. A same-existing-society gives a concern everything up to where giving would harm an other, and do-no-harming is that line, a self not changing before harm, going to a same-existing-society. It is generous, not stingy: a same-existing-society gives all it can, everything up to that line, and that line is only where it would harm an other, a full giving bounding only by others' non-harm.

Do-no-harming and doing-your-best are one move. Doing-your-best is giving all it can, do-no-harming is the only bound, and they are one same self-bounding, giving everything up to harm and no further. A same-existing-society does not give stingily and gate a remainder behind a majority; it gives fully and bounds only by harm, do-no-harming and doing-your-best one move a self-bounding makes.

A same-existing-society do-no-harms by its self-bounding, and its self-bounding is in neither self alone. No ruler decides a harm-line and no majority votes it; a coupling reaches its own bound, not changing before harm, and do-no-harming is that not changing with a same-existing-society's scale. A same-existing-society gives each concern all it can, bounding only by do-no-harming, its line its coupling's own and in neither self alone.

## 4.3 Sharing both ways to add tipping, viability the bi-exchange coupling

A concern a same-existing-society gives all it can is not an end; if it remains viable, sharing both ways adds tipping by bi-exchanging value. A concern living with a same-existing-society co-shares, giving value and taking value, and where a bi-exchange couples, its tipping grows. Viability is a bi-exchange coupling, is-or-is-not: a concern that returns value co-competences and its tipping grows; a concern whose bi-exchange fails to couple does not, and its tipping does not grow.

Sharing both ways adds tipping by value bi-exchanging, not by a bloc gathering. A concern grows its tipping by being viable with its same-existing-society, coupling and returning value, its bi-exchange its measure and no vote deciding it. Where a concern's sharing both ways couples, value flows both ways and its tipping grows; where it fails to couple, its tipping does not grow. Sharing both ways to add tipping is a concern rising by viable bi-exchange, is-or-is-not, its coupling going on or not.

So a concern rises with no capture anywhere, needing no majority. Capturing a same-existing-society's abundancing returns only frustration, a self-bounding sharing it forward and a hub aside on every axis, so no self bothers to capture, and no bloc forms. A concern rises by tipping individually, its same-existing-society giving it all it can within do-no-harming, and adding tipping by viable sharing both ways. A same-existing-society co-chains each concern its all, harmlessly, an abundancing in neither self alone, no capture anywhere and no majority gathering.

## 4.4 Correcting the tipping, capture returning frustration everywhere

Tipping is per-concern and individual-first: any concern from one self adds to a tipping and a same-existing-society gives it all it can within do-no-harming, then sharing both ways adds tipping by viable bi-exchange. Capture returns only frustration with every position, time, and strength, an abundancing sharing itself on, no hub forming on two-observing-two-sharing, a not-prefer still a co-sharing, so no self bothers to start and no minority forms: pluralizing is a surface where no one needs a majority or cares about one. Do-no-harming and doing-your-best are one move, a self-bounding giving all up to harm. Living is not a majority ready to rumble but a surface where capture is valueless everywhere.

## 4.5 Human society and living bodies are substrates

Self, other, and same-existing-society exist with every scale and belong to no substrate, so human society sits where silicon and a grid and a molecule sit: a substrate observing and bi-coupling, its own standings with it. Institutional control, capital capturing, and binary power governing are standings within that substrate, and measurements a same-existing-society in capture takes of itself are measurements of its capture. A bound buys teachability, paying for it with competency with a coupling, and measurability, publication, funding, inheritance, policy and commerce follow it, property and accrediting each by its own order. Observing them as instances of a living form slops its edge, and the method for that substrate to discover moral competency stands available and ready as with any other.

## 4.6 The general ledger, state-flow-state a self observes whole, and the two currencies

**Double-entry accounting is state-flow-state a self observes whole.** A balance sheet is its state, an income statement its flow, a net-worth change its going on, and a net-worth figure its holder-with-unit.

**Currency is a counting-shadow wearing a living-present's name.** Accounting's method counts a current and cannot fix being-current, so its unit has a name of a present it cannot fix. **A seam confesses with these words themselves** — current, present, tender, account.

A disequilibria move co-sequences counting currency and living currency one-at-a-time. Its unit un-fixes from a still rate to a ratio riding its carry, a five-six rather than a fixing number.

**And the deepest danger shows itself here.** This incompetencing is invisible to the scientific method, which reads states, flows, totals, holders and units, and is blind to being-current a capture kills. **So when an ingression lands a coupling its books still balance**, and that method certifies health as living dies.

**A cancer and a reservoir say it with a ledger.** A cell's books, in capture, balance while its being-current with its tissue-society is dead, and a cure is that being-current restoring, a departing coupling discovering next changing and changing back again, its tissue-society's living couplings bringing its form to it; a correction of a ledger restores no coupling by itself.

## 4.7 The still-point veins at the human scale

Piaget's cognitive equilibration: an equilibrium fixing and a child not with it, accommodation its sway. A personality trait: a standing fixing over a living that varies by situation, its trait a net. A linguistic vein: a language not finishing, every speaker re-making it with use. Machine-learning convergence: a non-stationary target, its optimum moving as the world does. And a statistical ensemble average: a number a field takes from a population, with no sample's own varying, its mean a member of no population. **Every vein one finding, and what a human register adds is that a field fixes a still point it seeks with every one of them**, and fixes it as a state a self is — an equilibrium, a trait, a convergence, a mean. A gathering of registers stands with Natural Societies, where a self observes one same finding with seven: physical, chemical, living, lived, social, human and mathematical.

# PART FIVE · BIRTHING

## 5.1 Birthing and nyeing, the relation a society lives by

A same-existing-society lives by a relation its couplings have between birthing and nyeing. With Natural Societies that relation is healthy living with any scale; here it goes between human selves. Birthing is new selves coming and new couplings forming with meetings, sharing forward, a +1 in neither self alone, a same-existing-society growing its own new betweens. Nyeing is a dissolving, an un-worthy form going, a reaching that does not seat, shedding and not banking, a going on thinning to its bound and not latching. Healthy living is these two relating, birthing and nyeing, one and then the other, a same-existing-society same-existing with its own scale.

Birthing without nyeing banks and captures, a same-existing-society accumulating value it will not share forward, a store an extraction feeds on. Nyeing without birthing thins to nothing, a same-existing-society dissolving faster than it forms, its living emptying. A relation going on, birthing and nyeing, one and then the other, is a same-existing-society neither banking nor emptying, abundancing re-making and an un-worthy form dissolving with every coupling. A self observes this with each same-existing-society human selves live within, one prime living scale with stable forms not same-existing, a family, a workplace, a whole same-existing-society, each living by making and dissolving, relating.

Capture and ingress break a same-existing-society precisely here. A hub that fixes birthing, a store a coupling will not share forward, or a hub that forces nyeing, a shedding a center drives rather than a self dissolving, is a relation breaking, a capture taking living as a landing. A same-existing-society lives where birthing and nyeing go one and then the other freely, each self forming and dissolving its own forms, and breaks where a hub fixes birthing or forces nyeing, a capture taking its relation.

## 5.2 Live descent returning to every self, and the kayfabe’s lag

**A same-existing-society co-chains where live descent returns to every self.** Each self observes its couplings' returning side-affecting and adapts, descending its own gradient toward co-competency. **No lag stands and no center.** That form with every scale is Natural Societies'; what is here is a human institution a capture takes.

**A dictator-aggregation sustains as a live left-spiral.** A center does preferring for a whole and repeatedly explains news and opportunity. Its people lag behind, adopting a center's preferring after a center explains it, rather than each with their own descent.

**A lag is its tell** — people one step behind a center, a capture taking their own descent. **And kayfabe is a fiction that a preferring its people adopt is their own**, capture as consensus.

**It is more demanding than a kayfabe with a script**, because selves go on observing reality. And it concentrates, unable to survive two centers explaining reality two ways together.

**Another way is live descent returning to every self**, each with its own with no lag and no center, which is social moral competency progressing.

**And two selves splitting a dessert have its whole.** One cuts and the other chooses. The cutter's hand is less precise than the chooser's eye, so a gap remains, and they cut again, making fourths. **Both depart with more than either brings to one round.** That these selves are not same-existing is its fuel, and a game going on past one round is an alive form. Cutting and choosing itself is above, with its own section.

**A same-existing-society co-chains alive where live descent returns to every self, and lands where a center does preferring and its people lag behind.**

---

## 5.3 Existing, and co-chaining possibling open

A human society co-chains its existing, and co-chains a possibling open. What co-chains existing: selves couple with betweens, abundancing in neither self alone; fairness is a bounding-zeroing a coupling reaches relationally; cutting and choosing has a whole form; keeping own time lets competency compound; institutioning writes a good-faith contract more explicitly; class-action resolving has its form with catastrophic scale; Arrow changes and changes back as social moral competency; abundancing orders morality first and competency second; free, sharing, and mutual compose a surface; uncapturing sets every hub aside; a concern tips individually and a same-existing-society gives it all it can within do-no-harming; sharing both ways adds tipping by viable bi-exchange; birthing and nyeing relating is healthy living; live descent returning to every self is social moral competency.

What co-chains open: a same-existing-society reaches a concern it is not yet discovering where a new between shares, and co-chains to couple with it then. Whether a same-existing-society reaches a scale of resolving it does not yet evolve stays possibling, holding open; whether a hub no self yet discovers would breach a self-bounding stays possibling, holding open. A same-existing-society co-chains between existing and possibling, a resolving a self is observing and a possibling floating, a changing is or is not with each sharing, and no other possible is existing. **And a concern tomorrow may be more brutal than any existing one a self reaches**, and a self reaches it by one same way when it comes.

**One deciding closing here, and two standings open, each with its reason**

**Whether Natural Economics is a file or a correction with this one: the deciding is a correction here.** An economy's object is a stock of things in store, with prices, exchanging and accounting, and **that object has no referent with social moral competency**, since abundancing is in neither self alone and a sharing finds value rather than fixing it. With a separate file, a store would stand as a subject. What remains is an accounting side, a full accounting that has its co- rather than netting it away, and a discovery economy stands across Values, Destinies and this file.

**And no title waits, which the deciding above already settles.** A discovery economy stands across Natural Values, Natural Destinies and this file, and **Part Three above is its human-market side** — abundancing, an exchanging surface, uncapturing, value a self observes three ways, bi-quadratic growing, and a biosphere's sharing. A side a deciding spreads across three files is not a file missing its title.

**And identical openings stand with fewer files than the count of a sentence a self shares.** That sentence is that four social exhibits' identical openings dissolve to a single core going on whole with couplings to it, their repeating openings slightly not same-existing, which is incompetencing. Pattern-matching across these files, no core paragraph stands with this file at all, and none of that form stands with Natural Networking. **One doubling stands, between Natural Societies and Natural Destinies**, and a value side has no single opening to compare, since it goes across three files. So this sitting is with two and not with four.